On Tuesday 28 May 2002 00.33, Vincent Danen wrote: > On Mon May 27, 2002 at 12:39:07AM -0700, Ben Reser wrote: > > > Oops, I just found the issue, fixed the rpm and provided it..., maybe I > > > shouldn't have... > > > > Not your fault Oden. Really it isn't a problem. I'm not convinced you > > and vdanen are talking about the same thing but I can't really go into > > details and explain it. vdanen will get it cleared up though. :) > > Actually, it's kinda funny. RedHat posted their updates which fix an > RFC822 bug we were supposed to coordinate... but they referenced this > other buffer overflow but it doesn't look like they included the patch > (Caldera did, however).
He he, that was funny... > Anyways, I put in a new version that has the proper patch applied (the > overflow patch was for a different bug, not referenced in their > advisory, although they didn't look to fix the bug that they *did* > reference). > > At any rate, since srpms are under public scrutiny, I assume the > RFC822 bug is public now and ours will be available shortly. Well, great! then the new imap will have two new fixes then? -- Regards // Oden Eriksson
