Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > btw do you know if there's anything that would be needed to change if > > syslog-ng were to become a real drop-in replacement for syslogd?
[...] > > 4. Add syslog-ng support to msec. > > The reason for a split is, logrotate for syslogd and syslog-ng refer to > the same files which means logs are rotated twice. What I had in mind is > to make syslog-ng conflict with syslogd. Alternative is (assuming > syslog-ng is adopted) to just check which one is currently running and > prime it. > > Fredl, do you have any plans to add support for external modules? It > would be ideal case - syslog-ng comes with own msec module to avoid > rewriting it every time. No I don't want to do that. I prefer to have a central point for all security related stuff. -- Fred - May the source be with you
