-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 30 May 2002 10:31 am, Tom Badran wrote: > On Thursday 30 May 2002 10:07 pm, Stefan van der Eijk wrote: > > True, but doesn't the concept of having a common base, on which vendors > > can certify their products once have an advantage? > > > > On of the main concerns I'm hearing from enterprise customers against > > Linux is that it's so fragmented. Perhaps this will help to get Linux > > more accepted for the enterprise. > > Thats what the LSB is for, and mandrake is a pretty good supporter of this.
And ive just been looking at the united linux site, and it seems to claim to want to be LSB certified, so i no longer have a complaint :). Either way, ill still be a supporter of mandrake until (and if - im not assuming they will) they do something crappy like make parts of their systems proprietry (ala yast in suse i believe). -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE89fWBXCpWOla2mCcRAj24AJ0Tqcsc85386gM9dxqwZeMGile9SgCfU5Sk mxr0b1ygT2/bCdsWBhBmhpI= =WVnm -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
