On Tue, 11 Jun 2002 15:55:38 +0400 Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You can't have both. You can't (always) install them in alphabetical > order without breaking dependencies. And urpmi can't check _all_ > dependencies so there is no guarantee that installation won't fail. You are correct, as usual,but I would still like to have the files dled in the same order as listed. Then if 1 or several fail to dl there is no need to guess as to which simply check their order on the list. Charles -------------- But what can you do with it? -- ubiquitous cry from Linux-user partner. (Submitted by Andy Pearce, [EMAIL PROTECTED]) ---------------------- Charles A Edwards [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----------------------
