On Tue, 2002-06-18 at 08:35, Borsenkow Andrej wrote: > > today/yesterday a new version of both the jre and jsdk came out > > (1.4.0_01-b03 binary release). one of the "bugs" resolved is the now > > support for glibc-2.2.5, so theoretically that should solve the issue. > > glibc-2.2.5 != gcc-3.1.1. So theoretically it has nothing to do with > original problem.
So all we need is a statically linked JVM, right, or am I misunderstanding the issue entirely? -- Brad Felmey
