daniel beck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > do we really need freeamp ? I thought freeamp and Zinf are the same > ... but zimf is less buggy (they share the same codebase, but the > project freeamp isn't active anymore ... look at this on the freamp > homepage : http://www.freeamp.org/index.html?mode=download)
strange, zinf upload should have obsolated freeamp. lenny, could you erase freeamp ? -- "on est en 2002 ?" (daouda)
