[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Fran�ois Pons) writes: > Borsenkow Andrej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > O.K. so it is a bug in rpminst, it incorrectly interprets urpmq output > > it seems. Francois, can you look into it or is new version ready for > > cooker-testing already to avoid wasting time on old rpminst? > > There is no newer rpminst comming, and Guillaume is working on a new > rpmdrake/MandrakeUpdate/rpminst so it is up to him to check this if necessary to > fix it now or wait new version.
Well since new batch is likely to be ready for 9.0, I'm not willing to fix rpminst :-). -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
