> process transparent, especially concerning disk I/O's. For
> example, when you play a realtime game, any process requesting
> CPU time, though put at +19, makes a big difference. I don't know
> what are the exact figures, but I guess it's impossible to have a
> process eat less than 10-15% of the CPU even if you nice it to
> the extreme.
>
Yes, but my point was that I didn't think that it would have been totally that
bad, at least not dragged the system down into something unusable.
My proposed change as mentioned in a previous mail would be to move it as a
weekly like FreeBSD.
Oh by the way, it's 4:19 am in Sydney, I just survived a slocate. :-)
-- Geoff.
