On 27 Jul 2002, Vox wrote: > Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Take the example below. Shouldn't > > > > build@s119b:~/CVS/dir2$ ls > > and > > build@s119b:~/CVS/dir1/dir2$ ls .. > > return the same? > > No. > > Vox
Thanks for the short nice answer :) Isn't there any way to make 'ls ..' and 'cd .. && ls' return the same? I want to link a directory into a source tree, and the subdir looks for '../file', which isn't there..... Sebastian
