--- Buchan Milne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Well, then not everyone has working dump/restore.
> Last time I checked,
> the opinion of lkml was that dump/restore (except on
> XFS using
> xfsdump/xfsrestore) WILL NOT WORK in 2.4. Ever.
> 
> So that's why I am asking what the point is of
> updating non-xfs
> dump/restore.
> 
> Maybe I am wrong, but that's my reason for asking.

Ok, I just didn't understand you.  I've only been able
to use ufsdump/ufsrestore on Solaris, I don't have
access to a Linux machine with a tape drive yet.

Well, no dump/restore on 2.4, that's terrible news! 
What do people do?

You know though, I recommended dump/restore to a
friend and haven't heard any complaints.  I should ask
him if he's actually got it going.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com

Reply via email to