hmm, this is what I've done already:

================================================

tried to remove most of the inconsistencies, like

- mdkconf patched config that was actually never used
  instead wine.reg was copied to user's config
- use patched sample config
- tried to guess which option is more sane when
  conflicts between wine.reg and mdkconf.old
- enabled artsdrv in config WinMM section (test!)
- adjusted font paths in config

- removed redundant winelauncher.sh because like above
  winelauncher patch was applied but the resulting
  winelauncher was never used,
  instead a static winelauncher.sh was used
- use generic winelaucher
- removed config edit from winelauncher according to danny
- left startup xmessage box intact for debugging (might want to rm that)
- make winelauncher cd to dir of exe, many apps want that
- put wine-config part into winelauncher

removed all traces of wine.reg (hopefully)

- removed redhat patch
- user config cp is now handled by winelauncher
  no need to patch the server for that
- adjusted winelauncher patch
- adjusted wine-config.pl

wine.systemreg, wine.userreg

- couldn't find where they are used so I removed them
- wine creates defaults of its own at first run

win.ini, system.ini

- removed static parts for win.ini and system.ini from
  make_a_ windows_ system.sh
- use sample win.ini, system.ini

made a dir /usr/share/wine/configsamples to hold the samples

============================================================

the stuff is not ready yet but if Danny is interested, I'll send the
stuff over to him

however, most of the apps that used to run under wine do not anymore.
Thing is, they even don't run with an unpatched, unmodified, pure tgz
build which used to be an infallible indicator for spec related errors.

I can run winzip, acrobat reader, even WMP (no sound though), but
iexplorer fails (used to start, at least), no game works (had FAKK2,
DeusEx, RTCW running will earlier versions)

Tons of wine warnings and an Unhandled exception at the end - and it
just barfs on me, strange

is this gcc related? I think I did build 20020710 when it came out, and
I did it on the then current cooker with gcc3.1, IIRC it did work with
more apps than now

- Mark



Reply via email to