Hi,

samba-2.2.3a-10mdk was somehow built without ACL support, even though the
SPEC file should include it.

Proof:

  1. rpm --requires samba does not list libacl as a requirement.
  2. ldd /usr/sbin/smbd does not list libacl as a linked library
  3. I cannot get Samba to display or modify ACLs created with setfacl on
     an XFS filesystem.

  4. Rebuilding samba-2.2.3a-10mdk gives an smbd that does link against
     libacl (according to ldd).

This is cc'ed to QA since there is nothing wrong with the source RPM file
(no missing BuildRequires for libacl-devel etc.) and yet somehow the
package managed to get built and distributed without ACL support.

Michael Brown


Reply via email to