1. Huh ?
There is a "way" to make your own kernel according to some
mandrake concept of what you're supposed to do ?
2. I have always gone and done everything after getting kernel
source, lilo, System.map, etc., etc., etc.,
Like, "I do hereby assume full responsibility..."
And I have not done that with 9B2 yet because it is 9B2
and deserves kicking around to see if it breaks.
I feel like it is a given that no kernel will come perfectly
out of the box... any comments appreciated here.
3. I have never seen any "Mandrake says step 1 should be..."
Readme.txt or something please, or pointer to existing...
?
-AEF
On Thursday 15 August 2002 08:10 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 09:34:53AM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> >> Sorry to dredge this up but as Mandrake 9 is still in beta I'm
> >> reminded of few points in theregister "review" of Mandrake 8.2
> >> (http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/25160.html).
> > Yeah it's like that so kernel upgrades take effect without editing
> > lilo.conf. If you compile a bad kernel and don't know how to use the
> > Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Or using grub, which allows you to type in the specific kernel, parameters
> and initrd you wish to use. It's saved me a few times when i built a bad
> kernel. Also, never delete the good kernel before testing the newly built
> one.
