Ben Reser wrote: > LAME isn't vulnerable to an attack. Maybe some of their users are. > LAME only distributes source. And they claim they are for educational > purposes only. It's not illegal to distribute source to a patented > algorithm, because to get the patent they have to disclose the method > anyway and source is just a description of the algo. However a binary > is an implmentation of the algo and there would violate the patent.
Isn't LAME totaly free of ISO code now so FH can't say anything as this isn't their code anymore. -- Live long and prosper!
