Your mail is considered as SPAM by spamassassin, here is why :

On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 10:20:24PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> SPAM: -------------------- Start SpamAssassin results ----------------------
> SPAM: This mail is probably spam.  The original message has been altered
> SPAM: so you can recognise or block similar unwanted mail in future.
> SPAM: See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
> SPAM: 
> SPAM: Content analysis details:   (7.6 hits, 5 required)
> SPAM: MSGID_HAS_NO_AT    (2.1 points)  Message-Id has no @ sign
> SPAM: INVALID_MSGID      (1.8 points)  Message-Id is not valid, according to RFC-2822
> SPAM: NO_REAL_NAME       (0.5 points)  From: does not include a real name
> SPAM: FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS  (0.4 points)  From: ends in numbers
> SPAM: DOUBLE_CAPSWORD    (1.1 points)  BODY: A word in all caps repeated on the line
> SPAM: DATE_IN_PAST_03_06 (0.7 points)  Date: is 3 to 6 hours before Received: date
> SPAM: RCVD_IN_MULTIHOP_DSBL (1.0 points)  RBL: Received via a relay in 
>multihop.dsbl.org
> SPAM:                    [RBL check: found 157.58.152.205.multihop.dsbl.org]
> SPAM: X_RCVD_IN_UNCONFIRMED_DSBL (1.0 points)  RBL: Received via a relay in 
>unconfirmed.dsbl.org
> SPAM:                    [RBL check: found 157.58.152.205.unconfirmed.dsbl.org]
> SPAM: FUDGE_MULTIHOP_RELAY (-1.0 points) RBL: Do not double penalize if an IP is a 
>multihop and an open relay
> SPAM: 
> SPAM: -------------------- End of SpamAssassin results ---------------------
> 

Reply via email to