Sebastian Dransfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Vincent Danen wrote: > > > I agree with you on this one tho... 0.9.1 does blow. I'm building a > > 2mdk right now that fixes the missing icons and > > requires/buildrequires, but I would personally like to see 0.8.10 back > > in main... it was much more reliable. > > I've used Eterm 0.9.1 for ages. Never had any problems.
So have I, never had any problems. The only catch is passing it the correct parameters during ./configure (or ./autogen.sh) so it works nicely...but outside of that, it's the best Eterm so far. Vox -- Pain is the gift of the gods, and I'm the one they chose as their messenger.... For info on safety in the BDSM lifestyle http://www.the-vox.com Think of the Linux community as a niche economy isolated by its beliefs. Kind of like the Amish, except that our religion requires us to use _higher_ technology than everyone else. -- Donald B. Marti Jr.
