On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 22:31, Austin Acton wrote: > Are you kidding? As a newbie I tried about six distros, and one of the > main reasons I stuck with Mandrake was because it had the most complete > and intuitive menu. Which does not have any flaws and cannot be improved?
On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 21:28, Frederic Crozat wrote: > This is YOUR opinion. We have another one. And Gnome menu layout > doesn't scale with all installed applications (not only GNOME > applications..) If the Gnome Menu does not fit the Mandrake User interface guidelines, it may as well be left out completely. If you insist on including it, a more appropriate name for it is "GNOME Menu" or better still just "GNOME" since the user knows it is a menu. 'menu GNOME' may make a lot of sense to French speaking people but sounds very strange in English. I understand that most Mandrake developers are French speaking, that is why forums like this exist so people can point out things that are overlooked. I doubt that the Mandrake Guidelines which you follow permit double entries with same titles. Such as two GNOME entries under Configuration? Finally, I thought it was obvious that everything I write here is MY OPINION, do you have an alternative way to propose improvements without stating one's opinion? I would appreciate the lesson so I can spare you the trouble next time. /michel
