Am Sonntag, 25. August 2002, 23:17:20 Uhr MET, schrieb Guillaume Rousse: > Le Dimanche 25 Ao�t 2002 23:01, Charles A Edwards a �crit : > > Could not the mdk and plf version include a conflict for the other? > > The reason I ask is that with both contrib and plf in my sources Any > > mplayer rpm be it mdk or plf will be updated by urpmi --auto-select when > > versions are the same dependent solely on time of build. > It depends not on time of build, but of release ordering by urpmi. Any Xplf > release take precedence over Xmdk, juste by virtue of alphabetical order, > which is quite fine for us as plf releases are full-featured.
I think he has a point here. If I don't upload the plf package after a new mdk release in time, he will "downgrade" from a plf to a mdk package with a higher release number. But this shouldn't be a reason for adding an artificial conflict between the plf and mdk releases. Just don't use the automatic upgrade for mplayer* and mencoder* -- G�tz Waschk <> master of computer science <> University of Rostock http://wwwtec.informatik.uni-rostock.de/~waschk/waschk.asc for PGP key --> Logout Fascism! <--
