On Mon, 2 Sep 2002 11:33:42 -0400
Levi Ramsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As a matter of fact, wasn't there an issue with Bram Moolenaar's
> requirement that vim patches be sent to him that prevented vim from
> being GPL-compatible?
Yep, mostly.
It is not GPL but he offers it as being 'GPL-compatible' and the
documentation under OPL.
He has too many troubling caveats for my liking.
Charles
--------------
I used to have a drinking problem. Now I love the stuff.
----------------------
Charles A Edwards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------
