-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Pbt wrote:
| Le sam 07/09/2002 � 17:03, Buchan Milne a �crit :

| Yes, my question was (excuse my poor english) : "when won't it be
| dangerous for NTFS partition?"

This is the wrong list to ask that question on, there must be a list for
ntfs developers.

|
|>>It wouldn't be a luxury because Win2000 and WinXP often use NTFS and we
|>>are not all ready to recompile kernel just for writing access...
|>
|>Which is the way it should stay until this is no longer labelled as
|>"dangerous" by the developers.
|>
|>Anyway, what do you want to do with NTFS write support?
|
| Just to have a look on win$ files because i still need it : TV output
| doesn't work yet with intel i810 video cards...

Make a vfat (fat32) partition for read-write between both windows and
linux. Alternatively, you could ask MS to add read support for ext2,
ext3, ReiserFS, JFS and XFS to the next version of Windows.

|
| The other sense of what i tried to explain is that a lot of people are
| now using NTFS partitions, more and more.

Granted. Some OEMs do even with XP Home, but then again, most OEMs
partition windows badly anyway, I normally repartition the machine even
if it won't run linux.

| Before (win98,winME,etc...), people used FAT partitions in majority but
| it's different now.

Better to not have NTFS write than to trash someones NTFS partition?

Buchan

- --
|----------------Registered Linux User #182071-----------------|
Buchan Milne                Mechanical Engineer, Network Manager
Cellphone * Work            +27 82 472 2231 * +27 21 8828820x121
Stellenbosch Automotive Engineering         http://www.cae.co.za
GPG Key                   http://ranger.dnsalias.com/bgmilne.asc
1024D/60D204A7 2919 E232 5610 A038 87B1 72D6 AC92 BA50 60D2 04A7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE9fJg7rJK6UGDSBKcRAn5SAKCmq5cC0p1zbeIhHc1Roa2MaDlhwwCfTCjy
9wSEoI94CmKmN3O/aFq6wVk=
=P+Ms
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply via email to