Pixel wrote: > there is no such thing called "boot.img". Nothing in the code refers > to boot.img, that's why we are perplexed !
Maybe he is using RedHat? <g> Yesterday, partly to kill time waiting for the mirrors to switch from RC3 to final, I installed RedHat 7.3 on a box that had RedHat 6.1. In RedHat, boot.img is for both CD and HD installs, instead of mdk separate cd.img & hd.img. -- ". . . . in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you . . . ." Matthew 7:12 NIV Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 Felix Miata *** http://members.ij.net/mrmazda/
