On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 10:37:42AM +1000, Ron Stodden wrote:
> These have been well reported before in the rc context.

Where?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=mandrake-cooker&w=2&r=1&s=ron+stodden&q=a

I don't see any XFree86 problem reports from you.  That's going through
every email you've ever posted accordding to theaimsgroup archive.

> Untrue.  "Why do you always feel the need to spew incorrect 
> information?"   You have plainly not checked out your information before 
> posting.   Here is the primary mirror:
> 
> [ron@small rsync]$ rsync rsync://ftp.uninett.no:873/Mandrake/
> 
> drwxr-xr-x        4096 2001/11/04 07:36:22 .
> drwxr-xr-x        4096 2002/09/26 03:29:03 Mandrake
> drwxr-xr-x        4096 2002/04/16 00:11:05 Mandrake-devel
> drwxr-xr-x        4096 2001/06/11 21:59:48 Mandrake-iso
> 
> [ron@small rsync]$ rsync rsync://ftp.uninett.no:873/Mandrake/Mandrake/
> 
> drwxr-xr-x        4096 2002/09/26 03:29:03 .
> drwxr-xr-x        4096 2002/09/26 00:51:36 9.0
> lrwxr-xr-x           3 2002/09/26 07:26:13 current
> drwxr-xr-x        4096 2002/09/26 02:13:52 iso
> -rw-r--r--      144860 2002/09/25 22:00:02 ls-lR.gz
> drwxr-sr-x        4096 2002/08/02 00:58:58 updates

There is no publically accessible "primary mirror."  Mandrake's own
mirror is only accessible to a couple mirrors.  Just because lots of
people use uninett.no doesn't make it a primary mirror.  And just
because it may have access to Mandrake's own mirror doesn't mean they
are going to carry anything.  Jeez.  As usual you're on your one track
hairbrained idea of the way things are and refuse to see how they really
are.

> >They are in the Mandrake-old tree and everything back to
> >7.2 is in that tree.  carroll.cac.psu.edu carries Mandrake-old as do a
> >number of other sites.  Do a search for Mandrake-old on google.

Did you even take the time to *LOOK* at carroll or any of the other
mirrors or do the search on google like I suggested?

>From the mandrake-old rsync source on carroll:
drwxr-xr-x        4096 2002/09/26 21:00:05 .
drwxr-xr-x        4096 2001/05/12 01:59:47 7.2
drwxr-sr-x        4096 2001/05/17 06:32:13 8.0
drwxr-xr-x        4096 2002/09/25 09:18:20 8.1
drwxr-xr-x        4096 2002/09/25 09:30:23 8.2
drwxr-xr-x        4096 2002/09/25 09:13:29 iso

Imagine that...

-- 
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org

Never take no as an answer from someone who isn't authorized to say yes.

Reply via email to