On s�ndagen den 29 september 2002 23.15 Han Boetes wrote: > Oden Eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On s�ndagen den 29 september 2002 20.40 Han Boetes wrote: > > > Oden Eriksson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > > > As you all might have noticed I have packed a lot of php and other > > > > web specific applications (like osCommerce), but I don't feel > > > > comfortable using any of the current RPM GROUPS. > > > > > > > > Couldn't we have something else like "Networking/WWW/Servers", > > > > "Networking/WWW/Mail", etc. ? > > > > > > > > "Networking/WWW" is too generic for me... > > > > > > I like this one: > > > > > > http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/ports/ > > > > > > With a few tweaks. > > > > Very funny... > > Yes but it wasn't a joke. Any attempt at categorizing software will fail > since lots of packages fall into two or more categories. Like ``net'' > seems nice but nearly anything falls into that category. > > So better make a simple one that doesn't pretend to be precise.
I really do understand the problem, but doing "cat /usr/share/doc/rpm-4.0.4/GROUPS" reveals a whole bunch of useless groups as I see it. In my sphere I have only "Monitoring", "Networking/Other", "Networking/WWW" and "System/Servers" to play with... I ended up using "System/Servers" on most of my packages... -- Regards // Oden Eriksson Deserve-IT Networks -> http://d-srv.com
