--- Guillaume Cottenceau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, though if the flexibility costs so much, it may > become > questionable whether we do it or we do other things > which may be > more useful to a larger number of people. I see your > problem as > something valuable but rather a "niche" than > something really > useful to a large number of people.
Doing this would be useful to more than just people networking mounting /usr. It would also be useful for standalone machines, mainly for security, manageability, and backup reasons. You could mount /usr locally, read-only, which can make things a little more secure, you can know that things aren't being modified 100 different in /usr that you don't know about, and you don't have to back up /usr. __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More http://faith.yahoo.com
