On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 05:22:43PM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote: > Sylvestre Taburet wrote: > >Christian Bricart wrote: > [..] > >>so it should be: samba-2.2.6-0.1.rc2.1mdk ..? > >> ^^^ > >> > > Not really, since: > > [bgmilne@bgmilne bgmilne]$ rpm -q samba-server > samba-server-2.2.6-1.0.pre2.2mdk > > So it's right, unless you want to keep pre2 over rc2.
Oh, that's true .. but now you'll keep rc2 over final .. as: 2.2.6-1.0.rc2.1mdk > 2.2.6-1mdk > > We are also putting spec files in samba cvs, final from official 2.2.6 > tarball will be 2.2.6-1.1mdk, packages for cooker/Mandrake will start > with 2mdk, CVS builds are 2.2.6-1.0.cvs`date +%Y%m%d`. hmm .. ok .. that will work .. but originally "1.1mdk"-naming has been for identifying updates as such. CVS however should be "$package-0.`date +%Y%m%d`.$build" > > Can you find a better solution which doesn't involve builds from a > tarball being 0.x releases or the use of Epoch/Serial tags, and can use > the same spec file for them all? If you do, let me know. I'll take a look at this :-) Hasn't there be a style guide ..? Christian -- "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." - Linus Torvalds
