On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 02:38:17PM -0500, Igor Izyumin wrote:
: On Friday 18 October 2002 02:03 pm, David Walser wrote:
: >
: > Unless the same happens for perl-Gtk, maybe switching
: > to Qt wouldn't be a bad idea, us not being able to
: > release MCC on Gtk+2 for 9.0 is a perfect
: > demonstration of why.
:
: QT would be a nicer choice than GTK. It looks better. GTK1 doesn't really
: look like Gnome2 and doesn't look like KDE. But then, that's up to the
: mandrake team to decide.
Oh dear god no. The thing I like about MCC and it being GTK-based is
that it *respects* my .gtkrc settings. I have a consistent-looking
desktop.
Try that with QT-based YaST2. Even after strongarming with qtconfig
portions of the same dialog box have on font while others have nothing
that looks like any of my choices.
Yuk...
--Jerry
Open-Source software isn't a matter of life or death...
...It's much more important than that!