"J.A. Magallon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 2002.10.18 Guillaume Cottenceau wrote: > >Elliott Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > >> On a slight side note, the fact that rpmdrake stops downloading while it waits > >> for you to decide to continue given a bad or non-existent gpg key should > >> definately be changed. The number of popups could be drastically reduced just > >> by doing the gpg check at the end of the downloads, and could be placed in > >> one dialog box with check boxes next to each package with a bad sig allowing > >> you to choose which ones you still want to install, if any. > > > >I put that in my todo. It sounds reasonable, logical, and good > >for people using it like you. If there is no technical problem, > >I'll do it. > > An idea: the common dialog+progress bar could be integrated in a GtkStatusBar > in the bottom of the window, and you get rid of the popup window most > used allthe time.
No, this is very different. We don't talk about rpmdrake itself here, but grpmi, the thing with the small window which does the download and actual install of packages. I don't think embedding grpmi into a statusbar of rpmdrake is a great idea. > And an option something like '--unattended' would be nice: install what you > can, if some pgk fails don't install it nor anything that depends on it. In the grpmi step, dependency is already calculated, so doing so would require pretty much many changes. > So you can start the update, go back in 2 hours and see what happened > (I know, urpmi supports something like this, but it requires to update > _everything_, not just select a bunch of packages) -- Guillaume Cottenceau - http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~gc/
