On 2002.10.22 Adam Williamson wrote: >On Tue, 2002-10-22 at 13:51, Combelles, Christophe (MED, ALTEN) wrote: >> Does anybody know what is the difference between a good font and a bad font? >> >> (The rendering engine has an important job, but the font is important too.) >> I have found that the program pfaedit is included by default in >> mandrake, it seems to be a very good tool to build fonts. >> But is having a good tool enough to build a good font ? > >Nope. I don't understand enough about fontography to understand the >problems exactly, but a good tool certainly isn't all you need. See the >difference between, say, Mandrake 9.0's default "sans" font and Verdana >as an example. I *believe* the trickiest part is in tweaking the >hinting, but I'm not sure of that.
TeX fonts are very carefully designed (look at it, tex font rendering is light years ahead of Word or XFree rendering), and for example the vectorial definition of fonts is different for the same font at small sizes than at large sizes. I do not know if freetype could get some hints from metafont... (or if they did already). -- J.A. Magallon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \ Software is like sex: werewolf.able.es \ It's better when it's free Mandrake Linux release 9.1 (Cooker) for i586 Linux 2.4.20-pre11-jam1 (gcc 3.2 (Mandrake Linux 9.0 3.2-2mdk))
