-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Le Mercredi 23 Octobre 2002 00:18, Brian J. Murrell a �crit :
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 11:52:32PM +0200, Philippe Coulonges wrote:
> > OK, changing security level is an pure sysadmin privilege,
> > sorry about this one.
>
> Don't be so quick. Ask yourself, why should adjusting the state of a
> machine (it's security level) be touching files in a potentially
> shared/read-only filesystem.
Exact, in a way. All the machines of a network (in the sense sharing the /usr)
don't have to be at the same security level.
In practice, sensitive machines with different (upper) security will nearly
always have their own /usr and often will not even have the same
system/distro/archi.
On the other, other hand as an arcturian friend of mine said, msec is not
network-oriented, it doesn't make the changes for all the similar machines,
so it should not make some of the changes in /usr while leaving other configs
untouched.
CU
CPHIL
- --
C'est tr�s tr�s long une journ�e : ca fait 86400 secondes. Et une seconde
c'est aussi tr�s long: ca fait 1000 milli�me de secondes ... tout ca fait
que mon uptime avance tr�s tr�s lentement.
== NLS: savoir downclocker son uptime ==
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9tdIGYJwqltj/jHgRAlwhAJ9DURwM/us1u2z5TGObdaPp++m5sACgii5/
A+HhhqGvvsxh74d+RwFjVnM=
=ry9X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
