----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Thierry Vignaud" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: [Cooker] [TV cards] bttv question


> Florent BERANGER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > Yes, about drakxtv bugs. Sorry if it's out of topic but I think that
> > drakxtv need to be upgraded.
> 
> there's no bug in not configuring something that cannot be configured

? In http://www.mandrake.com/en/archives/cooker/2002-11/msg00160.php message, 
the author says that he have to configure something manually. It's just a 
little bug, don't formalize please.

> 
> > > > > i quote you : "drakxtv doesn't handle all bttv cards"  
> > > >   
> > > > yes, some bttv cards doesn't works fine (no sound, only one channel
> > > > as described in
> > > > http://www.mandrake.com/en/archives/cooker/2002-11/msg00160.php )
> > > 
> > > you speak of totally different things: 
> > > 
> > > - support of cards supported by bttv, which we do fine for quite some
> > >   time
> > > 
> > > - support for other devices (such as dvb, saa7134, usb video, ...).
> > >   for each new case we added, we need to think before doing
> > >   anything. so are they webcam or real tv tuners ?
> >
> > They are TV cards in user view.
> 
> all i want to know is if they support chanell selection ?

no scantv with actual driver (see : http://www.emuit.com/webcam.html for more 
info).

> 
> > My only concern is that all TV cards will be handle by drakxtv that :
> > 
> > - configure it if it need to be configured (bttv cards for exemple)
> > 
> > - display a messagebox that the card is autoconfigured (usbvision
> > cards for exemple)
> > 
> > - display a messagebox that the card isn't supported yet / the
> > driver is in alpha step (and display the link of project web page
> > for info) / have a proprietary driver (and display the link of
> > driver web page for info)
> > 
> > Sorry if it wasn't clear before ;)
> 
> from what you wrote, i understand these usb devices are not tv tuners
> but just are more similar to webcam than to tv tuners.

It's not easy. These cards have a TV tuner (Philips SAA711x for info), the 
windows driver scan it but the linux one is in progress.

> 
> drakxtv point was to configure bttv cards since when i arrived at
> mandrakesoft, tv cards where hard to configure at :
> - kernel side : bttv didn't autoconfigure most tv cards at that time
> - user side : xawtv had no wizard to write a configuration file (even
>   no scantv at that time)

yes, you do greet works, I don't says the opposite !

> 
> obviously, there's no problems on kernel side with usb devices.
> what is left is user space applications.
> 
> if these cards are not tv tuners, aka they don't support v4l ioctl to
> select frequencies, but only enable apps to grab images, there's
> nothing to do.

Just inform the user that he's TV card is handled.

> 
> from what you wrote, it seems they don't support these ioctl.
> 
> so why do you want a wrapper to display bogus messages box ("we've
> nothing to configure but i just want to say you 'nice day'") instead
> of just running xawtv, which is just what we currently do.
> 
> i can accept your changes regarding harddrake::date *IF* these usb
> pets don't have the right class (can you provide me the info displayed
> by harddrake?)

Ok, no problem. I'll send it to you.

> 
> i won't apply changes that say "nothing to configure" instead of just
> running the right application.
> 
> if you think i missed something, prove me i'm wrong but stop this
> "spamming attitude" where you repeat always the same thing on public
> ml to force people doing something (draxtv, glibc, ...) instead of
> giving valid arguments.

It wasn't my intention.
Sorry if you have consider this thread as spam, I'll try to be more carefull 
in future.

> 
> obviously, if your usb devices are just webcams that've nothing
> to configure or that need to be configuring, then your mails sayging
> "drakxtv is buggy" are just plain lies.

I didn't says that. I only saw 2 problems :
- handle all TV cards
- a little bug in drakxtv

> 
> which i don't accept gratuitously.

Sorry/"D�sol� si tu l'as mal pris" Don't formalize on it.

> 
> a free software world doesn't meen free insults regarding quality of
> softwares.

I don't want to insult somebody and I think didn't insulted one.
I develop GPL softwares too.
And I repeat your software is quality (I only use Mdk at home).
That's normal that software have bugs. I don't blame you, I only focuses on 
little problems, don't formalize please.

> 
> > >   if they're just webcam, then there's no point in offering to
> > >   configure them in drakxtv since we cannot do anything.
> > >   webcam're managed through devfsd/hotplug/dynamic and appears
> > >   automatically on desktop.> > > > > kwintv is broken).
>

I hope it's the end of this thread,

  Florent



Reply via email to