Vox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The versions mentioned as already installed are the ones > installed. The thing that surprised the hell out of me is that the > versions mentioned as already installed are *not* the versions that > the new packages have. That makes no sense at all.
Does rpm work the same or only urpmi has problem (if it is a problem of urpmi?)? I don't see anything else wrong, once the error reappears, check with rpm on the file in the cache directly. Fran�ois.
