Gwenole Beauchesne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > And who wrote this? Oh yes, Olivier. :) > > >How do you deal with this type of files, all are packaged under %doc, > >but rpm-build failed: (actually I `rm` it in spec) > > rm it from where? Under $RPM_BUILD_ROOT? Then that's normal, %doc file > is not meant to have file "installed" under $RPM_BUILD_ROOT. > > So, if you have in your build dir, saysNEWS, simply %doc NEWS, don't > install it. This behavior hasn't changed.
14:29 mpol| duh, rpm now complains about files which are installed but unpackaged 14:29 mpol| I never ran into that before. it's new? 14:34 Han| mpol, indeed that is new. 14:34 Han| The script it not so good. It should just warn. 14:34 mpol| hmm, even when I rm those files it just stops after /usr/lib/rpm/check-files 14:36 mpol| trying another package. maybe something is brken here 14:36 mpol| hum, it just works... 14:38 Han| it's not broken 14:39 mpol| then something else is broken. weird 14:40 mpol| trying the previous version then.... 14:40 Han| rm -rf /usr/lib/rpm/check-files && ln -s /usr/bin/true /usr/lib/rpm/check-files 14:40 mpol| hum, yes, that might be a nice test too. :) //Han -- http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanb/software
