http://news.com.com/2100-1001-966666.html
You may find that article interesting. --- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now the way this disclosure went down does make me > uncomfortable if it > went down the way you say it did. But I think > you're making a lot of > assumptions in this case. And everyone can make > mistakes. If ISC turns > this into a habit of how they handle things... then > perhaps I'll switch. > But at present I'm not so uncomfortable with it to > make me want to > switch. The eyeballs effect offsets that > discomfort. And without a > tested, well used piece of software to turn to other > than djb's I don't > have a lot of other compelling choices (I've already > explained why I > don't care for djb's software). > > > Disappointment? I think you put too light of a > word on that particular > > situation. If someone is merely disappointed, > they should be asking > > themselves how much security and responsible > disclosure means to them. > > I'm disappointed. Fact is you are the only person > that I've heard > anything from about this. When openssh pulled their > stunt lots of > people were pissed at them about this. I'll reserve > judgement until I'm > presented with all the facts. Since I haven't heard > anyone present > ISC's statement of their position. I think it's > premature to judge > their motives and methods. Especially since your > position is based upon > a number of assumptions about what they did and did > not do that you > don't have any way of ascertaining for certain. > > -- > Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > http://ben.reser.org > > "If you're not making any mistakes, you're flat out > not trying hard > enough." - Jim Nichols > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus � Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
