On Sat, Nov 23, 2002 at 11:03:54AM +0200, Buchan Milne wrote:
> The previous release (the one we were upgrading) was 0.212, which rpm
> thought was newer (thus the need for the epoch). I am just preemptively
> packaging, since I don't think we need to keep adding epoch tags (ie when
> 0.4 is released).

I would have made it 0.310.  *shrug*

But yeah now I see the stupid versioning.

-- 
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org

"If you're not making any mistakes, you're flat out not trying hard
enough." - Jim Nichols

Reply via email to