On Sat, Nov 30, 2002 at 10:58:41PM +0100, [Bug 577] wrote:
> Instead of adding individuals urpmi options each time a new rpm option
> appears to be interesting, why not use a dedicated generic
> --rpm-option one to pass arbitrary options to rpm ? 

Can't do that... urpmi doesn't call the rpm command line interface but
uses rpmlib.  All the features of rpm have to implemented one at a
time...

-- 
Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://ben.reser.org

"If you're not making any mistakes, you're flat out not trying hard
enough." - Jim Nichols

Reply via email to