On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 00:49, Frederic Crozat wrote: > On Sun, 01 Dec 2002 17:36:38 +0000, Quel Qun wrote: > > > On Sun, 2002-12-01 at 05:55, G=F6tz Waschk wrote: > >> Am Freitag, 29. November 2002, 17:23:40 Uhr MET, schrieb Quel Qun: > >> > I managed until now to avoid anything dealing with nautilus, but here > >> > I am stuck. > >> > I realize these are only libs, but is this dependency really needed? > >>=20 > >> Galeon 1.3.0 again contains a really nice HTML browser view for Nautilus > >> :-) If you don't need it, rebuild galeon without libnautilus2-de= > > vel. > >> > > Couldn't the few files relevant to nautilus be split in an add-on rpm, > > leaving galeon with no dependency on nautilus? Additionally, if galeon > > provides anything to nautilus, shouldn't it be nautilus that requires > > galeon? > > Sorry but it is not possible.. Galeon binary is providing the nautilus > view service.. But nothing forces you to install nautilus... You just need > to install libnautilus2 package.. > k. I will give up on this one, but please read once again the last question. Since when an rpm that is _providing_ something requires the rpm that is actually _using_ this feature?
> > If I don't have the nautilus libs installed and force the galeon install > > with --nodeps nothing will break, right? That would mean that these libs > > aren't required by this package. > > I don't want to hear for thing like that.. :) I don't want to use it unless I am really stuck. It is a painful time-bomb. I just removed libnautilus however and, as expected, galeon runs fine (let's say as well as it can at the moment). -- Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
