On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 22:32, Quel Qun wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 20:53, R.I.P. Deaddog wrote:
> > On 2003-01-02(Thu) 21:47:42 -0500, Quel Qun wrote:
> > > Is there any reason why the last 0.9.0 version is not used in
> > > cooker instead of the old version. It seems that only gnumeric
> > > requires libgda0, but nothing prevents libgda2 to be installed
> > > besides it.
> > > 
> > > As a side note, libgnomedb2 should be required to build glade2
> > > and provide full gnome support.
> > 
> > As libgnomedb RPM is already in /incoming, it can be put into cooker
> > after some polishing. Fred here? Listening?
> > 
> > One note though. Should the RPM be renamed to "meageant"?
> Yes, I put gda2 and libgnomedb2 in incoming a while ago.
> 
> mergeant is a graphical ui and is separate. I have not packaged it since
> I did not need it at that time. I will try again.

That's what I thought, it does not build, mainly because of a quite
strong requirement of libgnomeprint-2.0 and libgnomeprintui-2.0. We are
in versioning hell yet again. It tries to link over libgnomeprint-2.so
and we only provide libgnomeprint-2-2.so. I don't know how to solve
this.

I actually had a dangling symlink on my system, surely coming from a
previous version.
-- 
Quel Qun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to