Soemthing that just happened to me made me think that documenting a
particular recovery process would help many people:
How to get your /etc/fstab file editted from a floppy boot when your
partitioning is set up to have a seperate /usr part:
Go into maintenance shell, as the e2fsck fails due to it thinking from
the /etc/fstab that a partition is /dev/hda5 when it is /dev/hda6 (or
some such radically wrong number, part 5 should always be the extended
part table).
type
/bin/cat /etc/fstab
find which part has /usr and mount it
now type
/usr/vi /etc/fstab
OR type
/usr/emacs-nox /etc/fstab
comment out the offending part spec.
POINT, you might be dropped in a maint shell and have a situation where
your file editors are in /usr and /usr is not mounted and you need to
figure out what part /usr is on to mount it.
SUGGESTION:
Stick an editor in /bin and document which one it is(vi would work, if
man were accessible easily from a / only mounting in a maint shell).
Most newbies do not know what usually is in the part of the / subtree on
/ part by default and quite a few read the NGs and are told to separate
out /usr.
I am also printing this for myself.
Just a thought, but could flesh out the procedure if wanted for newbie
to know how to edit /etc/fstab from what a floppy boot drops to when an
unrecoverable bad superblock error is triggered by diskdrake assigning
/dev/hda5 to first extended part and not allowing for the extended part
table(and then erroring as it is created, but still offering to write
the /etc/fstab, which I did let it do last night at 1 AM). diskdrake
defaults optional things like /cookermirror to extended\logical type,
but fails to set up an exclusion of part 5 for the extended part table
and writes a /dev/hda5 entry in /etc/fstab for the new part if it is the
first logical created on a physical disk-- sheesh. Then it decides the
extended part table has a bad superblock because is trying to use it as
a partition that can be read to and written to directly.
John.
- Re: [Cooker] diskdrake prob followed by maint session p... John Danielson, II
- Re: [Cooker] diskdrake prob followed by maint sess... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] diskdrake prob followed by maint ... John Danielson, II
- Re: [Cooker] diskdrake prob followed by ma... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] diskdrake prob followed b... John Danielson, II
- Re: [Cooker] diskdrake prob follo... Pixel
- Re: [Cooker] diskdrake prob f... John Danielson, II
- Re: [Cooker] diskdrake prob follo... Thomas Backlund
- Re: [Cooker] diskdrake prob f... John Danielson, II
