On Thu Jan 16 22:11 +0800, Leon Brooks wrote: > General question: if you were joint-packager for a handful-to-a-score of > packages, responsible for doing the following, could you cope? > > 1. Have an up-to-date local Cooker mirror and installation (mirror for > when the installation breaks badly, as in libc or something); and > > 2. A "potted" distro for each of the still-supported releases, against > which to apply and test security fixes (not necessarily on your own > machine); and > > 3. Be on the announce (and security if appropriate list) for the > packages; and > > 4. Be on your own private-ish little lists with the other co-packagers > to which bug reports can be triaged and on which responses can be > discussed.
1, 3, and 4 are no problem... I can't necessarily guarantee #2, though. -- Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Another January, another Bill Cowher choke-job GPG Key Fingerprint: 354C 7A02 77C5 9EE7 8538 4E8D DCD9 B4B0 DC35 67CD Currently playing: Stone Temple Pilots - Atlanta Linux 2.4.20-0.4mdk 13:50:00 up 1 day, 22:27, 8 users, load average: 0.04, 0.23, 0.31
