Main Mandrake Cooker site:   sunsite.uio.no

I use it frequently using rsync and fmirror

In the last few days, the performance has dropped dramatically.  Is it
just me?  or is everyone experiencing this?

I have a 2.3M ADSL line in Germany - here's the trace:

[root@foxbase rfox]# traceroute sunsite.uio.no
traceroute to spheniscus.uninett.no (158.36.2.10), 30 hops max, 38 byte
packets
 1  217.5.98.64 (217.5.98.64)  57.151 ms  57.127 ms  52.929 ms
 2  217.237.153.234 (217.237.153.234)  51.437 ms  50.971 ms  51.963 ms
 3  62.154.32.86 (62.154.32.86)  56.727 ms  57.190 ms  69.081 ms
 4  62.67.38.241 (62.67.38.241)  76.290 ms  73.971 ms  73.863 ms
 5  ae0-20.mp2.Hamburg1.Level3.net (195.122.140.202)  74.434 ms  77.849
ms  73.969 ms
 6  so-4-1-0.mpls2.Stockholm1.Level3.net (212.187.128.225)  97.708 ms 
98.573 ms  97.781 ms
 7  213.242.68.83 (213.242.68.83)  98.376 ms  98.635 ms  97.844 ms
 8  213.242.69.18 (213.242.69.18)  838.370 ms  835.256 ms  846.024 ms
 9  sw-gw.nordu.net (193.10.252.129)  841.173 ms  840.579 ms  838.895 ms
10  no-gw.nordu.net (193.10.68.30)  840.251 ms  840.422 ms  843.958 ms
11  oslo-gw1.uninett.no (193.10.68.50)  841.841 ms  852.246 ms  850.663
ms
12  spheniscus.uninett.no (158.36.2.10)  855.967 ms  856.664 ms  851.438
ms
[root@foxbase rfox]# ping sunsite.uio.no
PING spheniscus.uninett.no (158.36.2.10) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from spheniscus.uninett.no (158.36.2.10): icmp_seq=1 ttl=53
time=842 ms
64 bytes from spheniscus.uninett.no (158.36.2.10): icmp_seq=2 ttl=53
time=843 ms
64 bytes from spheniscus.uninett.no (158.36.2.10): icmp_seq=3 ttl=53
time=844 ms
64 bytes from spheniscus.uninett.no (158.36.2.10): icmp_seq=4 ttl=53
time=845 ms
64 bytes from spheniscus.uninett.no (158.36.2.10): icmp_seq=5 ttl=53
time=843 ms

--- spheniscus.uninett.no ping statistics ---
6 packets transmitted, 5 received, 16% packet loss, time 6272ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 842.266/843.772/845.071/1.485 ms

It would appear that somewhere between Stockholm and Oslo there's a
problem.

How do I report this and to whom?

Thx,
R.Fox


-- 
Robert Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fox Consulting Services


Reply via email to