Am Mittwoch, 29. Januar 2003, 19:29:26 Uhr MET, schrieb Buchan Milne: > Any reason not to update? > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/wxwindows/wxBase-2.2.9.tar.bz2 > or > http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/wxwindows/wxBase-2.4.0.tar.bz2 > It would be nice if wxWindows and wxBase matched ...
Hi, does anyone use wxBase? > I don't know if Gotz wants to comment here, but at present we still have > unstable and stable releases of wxgtk. Here are all the wx RPMs in > contrib (yesterday): This is the latest stable version: > cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS2/libwxgtk2.4-2.4.0-1mdk.i586.rpm > cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS2/libwxgtk2.4-devel-2.4.0-1mdk.i586.rpm > cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS2/libwxgtkgl2.4-2.4.0-1mdk.i586.rpm > cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS2/wxGTK-2.4.0-1mdk.i586.rpm This is used by my plf package of pyslsk: > cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS2/wxPythonGTK-2.4.0.1-1mdk.i586.rpm These contain the same library as above, because the official packages of wxPythonGTK do it the same way (include CVS wxGTK2.4 and don't link against the released version). > cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS2/libwxPythonGTK2.4-2.4.0.1-1mdk.i586.rpm > cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS2/libwxPythonGTK2.4-devel-2.4.0.1-1mdk.i586.rpm These are still needed by audacity: > cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS2/wxGTK2.3_1-2.3.2-9mdk.i586.rpm > cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS2/wxGTK2.3_1-devel-2.3.2-9mdk.i586.rpm > cooker/i586/Mandrake/RPMS2/wxGTK2.3_1-gl-2.3.2-9mdk.i586.rpm > BTW, this was worse in 9.0, where there were two versions of the > unstable 2.3 series, and no 2.2.x. I am still working with 2.2.x (don't > want to mess with unicode when I just want to finish my code so I can > hand in my thesis), so I maintain my own RPMs since 9.0, but I just > don't understand why there wasn't a 2.2.x? Maybe nobody else needed them? -- G�tz Waschk <> master of computer science <> University of Rostock http://wwwtec.informatik.uni-rostock.de/~waschk/waschk.asc for PGP key --> Logout Fascism! <--
