-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yes, I would have no problem with mandrake making their own dm calling it mdkdm or mdm or whatever, but kdm on my machine right now is not kdm, I want kdm to be kdm not someone's replacement of it. I like the features that kdm had, and personally I'd like them back.
gdm is now it's own package, why not have mdm be another and leave kde alone, let it be kde. On Friday 31 January 2003 10:06 am, Buchan Milne wrote: > Jason Straight wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Can we at least have the old kdm as /usr/bin/kdm.doesnt_suck or > > something. > > > > What was the point of replacing something that worked with something that > > has less features? I no longer have focus last user, no clock, no user > > selection, and it's automatic action when I hit enter was to reboot my > > computer. > > Some more issues: > -Password field doesn't select the existing password when you use TAB if > you entered the wrong password the first time (kdm did). > -"Valid" is a really bad word to use in place of "OK" (win2k) or "Go!" > (normal kdm). > > But the new lilo splash does look quite good. > > > What was the point of this really? To be more like redhat? > > If anything, work on kdm should be to make it compatible with gdm and > have the same features, so we can launch a new kdm greeter from within a > running wm (like gdm can). > > Please rather add features to the existing kdm than stuff it up. > > Regards, > Buchan - -- Jason Straight [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq: 1796276 pgp: http://www.JeetKuneDoMaster.net/~jason/pubkey.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBPjqkVhFHZPcobeHxAQJ8ygP+NOu/xQwj8pZ4XRYXVD5XU9v70dzTp57d Ob4tY6z686KKdNehF8+nrPDSbuyQxk5r3SxECJtSz9a1SGhGnwNsnt9wDtvu+58m D9MQOK2dhmHMvttVXqmQJhu6US3rQ4huN3dKGbKnObXQZJE9YnZLNKnigi3yUu1F xxShtrCOtok= =5tWX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
