On Sat Feb 01 18:42 +0100, andre wrote: > On Saturday 01 February 2003 18:09, Leon Brooks wrote: > > You can apply those to source, which means you can check them, be more > > selective, and mix patches if necessary. Closed source doesn't permit that. > > Also, PostgreSQL seems to have suffered far fewer security faux pas > > (francophones: any idea how I pluralise that?) than MS-SQL-Server. > > Don't think it has a plural version because faux is plural but my french is > really bad so could be wrong
/me falls back on my high school French from some years ago... IIRC, pas (step) is the noun in that phrase, with faux (false) being the adjective. I don't believe there is a separate plural form for either. And it's pluralize, Leon... ;o) -- Levi Ramsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 354C 7A02 77C5 9EE7 8538 4E8D DCD9 B4B0 DC35 67CD Currently playing: Moby Dick.ogg Linux 2.4.21pre4-1mdk 19:40:00 up 4 min, 3 users, load average: 2.35, 1.84, 0.80
