-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Now that I feel mandrake has done the politically correct thing by not taking away our choice, I'd like to know more about mdkkdm and what it's plans are?
One suggestion, move it to another name so it can be installed alongside kdebase-kdm, so those of us who want to help can flip back and forth as we play ;) I take it due to it's initial replacement of kdm that it's supposed to be a 100% compatible drop in for kdm, is it meant to have perfect function match eventually? I mean will all features in the kcontrol panel eventually reflect settings to mdkkdm? What is the whole reason behind mdkkdm? Just branding or is there some goal to new added functionality that's being worked on? In the past I've seen mdk changes that were not liked at first, I remember some rpmdrake things that really pissed people off, but mdk came through with a very nice rpmdrake. I trust that will happen with mdkkdm as well, but I'm glad the choice isn't taken away from us now to use what we want to use. I think kde's kdm is really nice, couldn't the kdm that's already there just have some branding added to it by mdk without redoing the layout and functions? I still think it should be a separate package however even in that case. - -- Jason Straight [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq: 1796276 pgp: http://www.JeetKuneDoMaster.net/~jason/pubkey.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iQCVAwUBPj5/ChFHZPcobeHxAQLw0wP/Uh5U1KshwWEoBt9OZL+lr9doUohH2RNd DV1QWxJD2loCn3q2Rr4/avpuWr95Of27IyDfmGa1WlT5qzoGKj0TjbL56Xs4hi5U 7bgRqK5k/yGgvSMsakVIfRgVa1im07F8UPI+he9pwpuk9D5O3ZsDpBBwx/4Z6rJv wkI51G2/mWc= =kmwI -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
