> > This sounds great, so , now, what is the definition of a developer ? > > One who contributes tangible material to the distro. Software, > documentation, detailed bug-reports, graphics. > > > I propose ( as a draft ) "someone having write access to some part of the > > distribution", this will include website developers, documentation > > writers, and packagers. > > I don't agree, necessarily. A leading distro has to have tight > standards. > It's hard to get people to closely follow these standards.
So, we need to have a "review standard" team. We need to have written standards. And the review team will check if everything is in order before realeasing a new version, during the features frezzes. We also need to support equaly contribs and main, don't you think ? What about plf ? > That said, there > must be a quick and easy way for new developers to have their work > appraised, committed, and acknowledged. You are right, so, changes should be check by others, by a senior developper. So, we need to have a team for this, so, secund team is "senior developper charged of the initiation of young jedi". -- Michaël Scherer
