On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 02:07:17PM -0500, et wrote: > no,,, that is up to the lawyers at this stage, I believe, at least it sure > would be if it was in Fla. and I am sure there are things we would love to > know, but to make "public" at this stage could weel leave the person making > it public liable for any (imagined) damage it might have caused.
You can't be sued for releasing facts. Please stop spreading FUD. Unless you signed a NDA or some other requirement to keep it to yourself. I most definately have not signed any such document related to this information. And I have received it from several independent sources. (The only NDA I've signed with Mandrakesoft relates to information that I receive related to security updates that are non-public.) But really since you don't know what I'm talking about you really can't be making hypothetical statements about what the consequences would or would not be if I were to release it. -- Ben Reser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://ben.reser.org "America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy. She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all. She is the champion only of her own." -- John Quincy Adams, July 4th, 1821
