On Thursday 20 February 2003 00:53, Greg Meyer wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Wednesday 19 February 2003 06:27 pm, Sascha Noyes wrote:
> > > The answer to the question is that the acpi implementation depends on
> > > the apic, so if the apic does not work properly, acpi will not work
> > > properly either.
> >
> > I've got a Compaq Presario 700 series laptop. I had to recompile the
> > kernel and leave away apic to get acpi to function. The only way that I
> > have tested the functionality of acpi is wrt cpu & fan throttling,
> > shutdown and reboot. These all work fine. Which acpi functions depend on
> > apic? How will acpi missbehave if apic is not installed. Any remedies?
>
> Since the apic maps the interrupts, and acpi monitors the interrupts for
> activity, a broken apic implementation can prevent acpi from working
> properly.  I know on my machine (which is a desktop) if I boot with apic
> off but acpi on, I get an entry about avery .1 second about apic errors in
> my message log that I presume are coming from acpi, because if I then boot
> with acpi=off in addition to noapic the errors go away.
>
> It seems that acpi for laptops is much more advanced than it is in the
> desktop arena, so you're laptop may work fine, but many desktops get hosed.

Yes acpi is broken on a lot of bios on desktop machine. They have incomplete 
incompatible acpi implementations. Try to use hybernate on win98se or winXP 
on a desktopmachine. You wont be happy with a lot of them. as hibernate is 
not the same as acpi you may try to install winXP on a desktopmachine with 
acpi. So in my eyes the problem of acpi under Linux is that the 
acpi-implementation has to workaround around a lot of faulty hardware. Since 
Notebooks rely on a good powersaving they have to implement working acpi 
implementations and as apm and acpi do pretty much the same , but acpi can 
more than apm, the throw away apm. 

Didn't read the whole thread, hope this was not OT ;)

-- 
Regards
Steffen
____________________
counter.li.org : #296567.
machine: 181800
vdr-box : 87
____________________
Please dont CC me, since if I have replied I'll watch the tread. Both mails 
will be filtered to the ML-folder. Thanks

Reply via email to