-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Frederik, 

> I already explained why it is INVALID..

  Actually you had not. It didn't seem you understood my bug report, as you 
addressed the issue of D.E. detection - an entirely different concept.

> Bugzilla is not a place to discuss, cooker is the right place..

I already had made similar suggestion on Cooker concerning Geramik, which got 
a postitive response. I would appreciate a response to the content of my 
response.

Since you are a Gnome developer, it may be that you think that I'm suggesting 
that Gnome become "subserviant" to KDE in this manor. I am not -- I am 
suggesting that both Gnome and KDE coordinate colors in Mandrake 9.1, thus 
raising usability to be more like that of Mac OS or Windows.

  -Tim

On Thursday 20 February 2003 01:26 pm, fcrozat wrote:
> https://qa.mandrakesoft.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1967
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:
>
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>- Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
>          Resolution|                            |INVALID
>
>
>
> ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2003-02-20 20:26
> ------- Please, do NOT reopen bug closed as INVALID..
>
> I already explained why it is INVALID..
>
> Bugzilla is not a place to discuss, cooker is the right place..
>
>
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug, or are watching the reporter.
>
>
>
> ------- Reminder: -------
> assigned_to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> status: RESOLVED
> creation_date:
> description:
> Hi,
>   I noticed that Mandrake Galaxy gtk, while much nicer looking atm than
> Mandrake Galaxy KDE, does not seem to be able to change colors, at
> least that I've noticed. The issue being that if I'm using KDE, like many
> of your users are, I may choose to change the color scheme, which inturn
> causes GTK stuff to stick out really badly.
>
>   There is a very easy way to solve this, which is why I am reporting this.
> libqtpixmap, a derivative of the libpixmap engine employed by most GTK
> themes, does color matching with KDE's color settings. Now, I'm not sure
> how Galaxy's theme engine works, but I'm assuming importing the code for
> this other engine (which is the one used for Geramik, by the way) would be
> relatively easy. If, on top of that, you made a little tool to adjust the
> color settings from Gnome, Mandrake would be the FIRST distribution (afaik)
> to offer both KDE and Gnome users and easy way to keep all major
> applications using the same color scheme!
>
>   This would dramatically improve Galaxy and fix a major usability "bug"
> between KDE and Gnome that has never been solved before right out of
> the box. Using a static color palate in GTK apps is alright, but the whole
> unified look is only good so long as no one changes the KDE color
> scheme. I noted this in my review of Red Hat Linux 8 (at OfB.biz) and
> marked down the visual apperance somewhat because of that problem. In
> a way unified widgets giving the appearance of all the applications being
> the same, will probably confuse users MORE when the color palates won't
> change all of the applications. It'll probably result in support headaches,
> I'd suspect.
>
>   Anyway, libqtpixmap is available for both GTK1 and GTK2. I can't say how
> much I think this would be a great thing, and everyone who has ever
> wanted to be able to easily adjust GTK color schemes (probably most
> Windows migrants) will thank-you for making the change.
>
>   -Tim

- -- 
- ----------------------------------------------------------------
Timothy R. Butler                    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Universal  Networks                       http://www.uninet.info
Christian Portal and Search Tool:       http://www.faithtree.com
Enterprise Open Source Journal:               http://www.ofb.biz
================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+VTMHK37Cns9gJ0gRAu9sAJ0bzBKMtrNdXFbJZdKgCFZ6S5cCtQCeJJRL
JY3ZIg0OJf7fV26NlGMAgAU=
=1Omb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply via email to