Guillaume Rousse wrote: > BTW, i have aspell-el ready to roll since a long time, except i've been > unable to build it with greek translation of word "greek" taken from > locales spec files: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg82258.html
As I mentioned in bug 1714, "%define languagelocal ..." is no longer needed, since langualgelocal isn't used elsewhere. It *was* used in the spec files prior to 0.50. Eliminating this define solves the "... does not appear to be a specfile" problem. BTW, Stefan Siegel has removed languagelocal from the new aspell-de.spec. > Also, i'm not sure about the claim from bug 1714 than LC_ALL requirement > to build the different packages is useless. Even if build succed, is the > dictionnary still correct relating to sorting issues (maybe) and special > charachters handling ? To check this, I just built aspell-el and aspell-es with three different settings for the LC_ALL and LANG: 1A. aspell-el: No LC_ALL (default); LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 (default) 1B. aspell-es: No LC_ALL (default); LANG=en_GB (because -UTF8 fails) 2A. aspell-el: LANG=el; LC_ALL=el 2B. aspell-es: LANG=es; LC_ALL=es 3. Both: LANG=no; LC_ALL=no (my own language) For each build, I renamed the ~/rpm/BUILD/aspell-xx-0.50-x directory to prevent overwriting. Then I recursively compared the contents of the various build directories for the same language, using e.g. diff -r aspell-xx-0.50-x1 aspell-xx-0.50-x2 or, in order to also list identical files: diff -rs aspell-xx-0.50-x1 aspell-xx-0.50-x2 Result: No differences at all. (When using the -rs option, I did check that all filenames I got from "rpm -ql aspell-xx" were listed.) I suspect the LANG environment variable does the same for me as LC_ALL previously did. Setting LC_ALL doesn't seem to have any effect; and I get no results from "env |grep LC". It's LANG that decides if a build of aspell-es (or aspell-fo) succeeds; and so far I've only had problems with en_GB.UTF-8. The build system used a lightweight install of Mandrake 9.1 beta 1 with some updates and additions of development packages from Cooker around the time beta 2 was released.
