[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Buchan Milne) writes: > John Allen wrote: > > On Thursday 27 February 2003 16:47, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > >>I can't urpmi --auto-select ATM because tmdns -10mdk seems to conflict > >>with bind. I currently have tmdns -9mdk installed alongside bind and it > >>didn't complain about that, so is the conflict correct? Currently it > >>wants me to remove bind to do an --auto-select... > > > > > > If you are running tmdns you should not need bind. > > > > Caching dns on a small network? Or does tmdns cache request from real > DNS servers? Would they be able to run simultaneously?
they both listen to the 53 port ... unless you customize their setups ... -- Florin http://www.mandrakesoft.com http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~florin/
